![]() ![]() The 35-page political research dossier, prepared by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele, has become central to congressional probes into Russian interference in the 2016 US elections. That Republican's identity is not yet known.įusion GPS has asked that a federal judge to block a House Intelligence Committee request to gain access to the company's bank records, saying it would violate its constitutional rights. The payments continued until just days before the November 2016 election.Įven before that deal, Fusion GPS's research into Trump was funded by a rival in the Republican presidential primary election. In April 2016, lawyer Marc Elias, working on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Washington firm Fusion GPS to examine Trump's Russia links, according to the report. In information available on its website, the FBI writes that "informants are individuals who supply information to the FBI on a confidential basis," adding that "they are not hired or trained employees of the FBI, although they may receive compensation in some instances for their information and expenses.Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped pay for research that went into a salacious dossier on Donald Trump's alleged campaign ties to Russia, The Washington Post reported. The reference to "taxpayers money" is likewise misleading because it is not unusual for the FBI to pay informants and the agency does not make a secret out of it. The FBI as part of its investigation was seeking to "corroborate or refute" the serious allegations. ![]() to deliver campaign-destroying information" on Trump. It is also a mischaracterization of the FBI's work to say it sought to incentivize "a spy. While Steele has indeed previously worked for the British foreign intelligence service MI6, he did not represent it in this case, and acted as a private citizen, not a "foreign spy." However, a number of details in the tweet above and other social media comments are not entirely accurate and in some cases misleading. Fact check: Kim Dotcom's claim Ukraine defense chief wore swastika braceletĪuten, the first prosecution's witness in the trial, said that the Steele dossier was used to reinforce the surveillance around Trump, even though the FBI couldn't corroborate the allegations contained in the report.Fact Check: Was pro-Russian "Karen" jailed for spitting at Secret Service?.Fact Check: Were 30,000 non-citizens told to vote in November midterms?. ![]() between the former British spy and a number of FBI officials. Steele was offered anywhere up to a million dollars."Īccording to Auten, Steele was made the $1 million offer by the agency in October 2016 during a meeting in the U.K. Special counsel John Durham, who's leading the case against Danchenko, asked FBI supervisory analyst Brian Auten on October 11 if the FBI ever offered to provide Steele with any incentives in exchange for information corroborating his dossier's allegations.Īuten responded: "Yes, it did. Prosecutors now accuse Danchenko of lying about the information provided and his sources, an accusation he denies. It included allegations of contact between the Trump campaign and Russian government officials, including those (as it was later established) made by the report's main source Danchenko. The controversial " Steele dossier" was first triggered initially by GOP-linked website the Washington Free Beacon and later picked up for "opposition research" by Democrats during the 2016 presidential campaign. While the tweet doesn't state so explicitly, drawing on the context suggests that it is referencing Christopher Steele. That's so much worse than Watergate.- Bonchie October 11, 2022 I know no one cares anymore, but today we learned that the FBI tried to use taxpayer money to pay a foreign spy $1M to deliver campaign-destroying information on Donald Trump prior to the 2016 election. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |